A very common complaint among the contemporary feminists
with a penchant for popular culture and some level of geekery is that
concerning the lack of strong female characters in the vast majority of TV
shows and movies. In particular, the argument is often presented in the form of
“there are female characters in shows and some of them are really badass but …” at
which point character flaws and problems with the writing are pointed out.
Buffy Summers of Buffy the Vampire Slayer is a typical example. While definitely
being strong and empowered in her attempts to fight evil and be a somewhat
normal teenager at the same time, Buffy’s character is often criticized as
dependent on male guidance in the sense of the Watcher’s Council and the often
troublesome nature of her sex life. A similar complaint is usually brought up
in relation to Zoe Washburn from Firefly. While being calm, composed,
competent, Zoe is criticized for relying on the captain of her ship as a male
authority figure too much. Moreover, in the episode “Our Ms. Reynolds” she
seems to be mocked for her lack of typically feminine virtues such as cooking
and she seems to take this mockery rather personally. I have also recently come
across some serious criticism of the way Irene Adler is depicted in BBC’s Sherlock.
While I understand that she had indeed beaten Sherlock Holmes in the canon, the
complaint about her being a sex worker and exhibiting emotions upon being
defeated are clearly independent of the parallels between the show and the
books and stems from a feminist analysis of the show. Relative to these and a
variety of other examples I’d like to discuss the importance of female
characters on film and television shows but also the possible problems with
criticizing them in a seemingly feminist manner.
The importance of a fair representation of women in TV shows
and movies is in some sense double. One part of the issue is the previously
discussed idea of role models. Little girls watch TV and plan on growing up to
be just like their favorite characters and if these characters are flawed or
show women in a negative light then simple logic implies that the same little
girls should not be exposed to them or perceive them as idols. On the other
hand, the same process that seems to be roughly summed up by the idea of
internalization happens for everyone else. The existence of a prominent female
character that reflects poorly on women therefore modifies not only the women’s
opinions of themselves in a negative way but also provides everyone else with a
potential harmful idea of what women are like. Buffy or Zoe seeking guidance
from male authority figures therefore impacts both the male and the female
viewer in the sense that increases the chances of either of them naturally
assuming to be fit for the position of the guidance-seeker and the guide,
respectively.
The more interesting question seems to be that of how
criticism of these characters should be handled given the psychological setup
that is assumed to lead to their labeling as problematic. To be more specific,
it seems important to consider whether the call for “real” strong or feminist
female character can be as detrimental for the perception of women as the lack
of these characters. It is kind of a given that a perfect feminist does not
exist anywhere in the real world and it is hard to imagine what she (how come
we never talk about male feminist characters in this context?) she would be
like. The idea of what a ‘good’ or a ‘true’ feminist is like is rather vague
and seems to be subjective more than anything. The same seems to apply to
creating a ‘real’ strong female character. Real women tend to be plagued by all
sorts of flaws and all sorts of doubts. A loud angry feminist might chose to
spend hours in the kitchen cooking for her partner the same way a cheerleader
might prove to be an expert on Judith Butler. Real women are complex and
generally not even close to avoiding behaviors that could attract criticisms
aimed in some variety of feminist theory. The problem with excessive criticism
of female characters that do somewhat fit the bill of strong, independent or
whatever else you think a good female character should be is exactly in the
fact that these characters often mimic real women in ways that might seem too
realistic or borderline uncomfortable. It is a peculiar twist to think about
the characteristics of women that are critiqued through the critiques of
fictional female characters. If young women and girls can be influenced by their
fictional idols then they can definitely be influenced by the emphasizing of
the flaws of these same idols. It seems rather silly to set up the stage for
some variety of a stereotype threat for aspiring ‘real’ strong women or
feminists.
I was personally somewhat relieved by the fact
that Irene Adler did not end up being just a cold blooded, scheming dominatrix
but managed to show some emotions. Considering
the BBC series as an independent work or fiction, her character didn’t seem to
get treated any more cruelly than that of anyone else Sherlock interacts with in the
currently completed six episodes of the show. Similar things can be said of
Buffy and Zoe. It seems implausible that they would break all power structures
and riot instead of fighting their battles just because their superiors are
men. It is problematic that there aren’t many women in traditional roles of
power in either show bute neither Buffy nor Zoe seem to be such harmful role models as it sometime seems.
Finally, I want to stress that I am not trying to argue against
recognizing hints of gender inequality in popular culture and various fandoms
but voicing these concerns needs to be done in a way that does not reflect
negatively on the fact that real women and real feminists are not perfect. At
the end of the day most of these heroines get around attaining a happy ending
and it seems great to know that one’s idols can make it there while sometimes
suffering imperfection.
Stay tuned for a guest post on girls in gaming and the recent controversy about League of Legends and the all-female Team Siren.
Stay tuned for a guest post on girls in gaming and the recent controversy about League of Legends and the all-female Team Siren.
No comments:
Post a Comment